We’ve moved! Click here to view our most recent content!

Set Regional Preference
Required Field*
Set geographic preferences to highlight topics of greatest interest of you, written in your base currency.


Aon Retirement and Investment Blog

2019 a year for better or worse?

2019: A year for better or worse?

It is often like that. Markets like to swing from extremes. 2018 saw a huge psychological reversal from the previous year (and for that matter, most of the previous half decade) – ‘let us look to the bright side… turned into ‘No, let us look to the dark side instead’. Remembering this long-held market tendency, it is perhaps not so remarkable that a year of decent global economic growth, with a booming US economy that saw S&P 500 earnings rise in excess of 20% and during which central banks were confident enough in the outlook to tighten monetary policy - also saw weak market conditions. Perhaps it is better to characterise the year as more a case of confusion than carnage – risk assets were weak, but, as we know, even bonds mostly lost value. 
Part of the difficulty for so many - asset managers, institutional and retail investors, really just about everyone, is to work out when the shift from one extreme to another is going to occur. Some extremes hang around, others are short-lived. It is sudden changes in market psychology, like the one we saw last year, that often wrongfoot.
So is this year going to be better or worse than 2018? Will this be a continuation of looking through the glass darkly as in late 2018? Market psychology is not impervious to the flow of economic and market fact, but the interpretive process on how good or bad things are is what brings magic and mystery to markets. What will happen to economic conditions is hard to call, but predicting market interpretation vastly more difficult. With that all-enveloping caveat on the market outlook, here are four questions, the answers to which will have a bearing on what sort of a year this is. As is readily apparent, these are interlinked, interlocking questions. 
Will trade stay at skirmish level or move to actual war? We are now getting to a point where further escalation in trade conflicts could bring major economic consequences. Currently, the kind of trade conflict and policy uncertainty we have seen has impacted corporate cost structures and business investment planning, going by stock price behaviour and comments made by company managers at quarterly analyst briefings. Its impact at the global macroeconomic level in pulling economic growth down significantly is not clear yet, however. That said, what is apparent is that further escalation could potentially make a big difference. That markets are down partly on trade fears and stocks of the most internationally exposed sectors/companies are down the most, may now restrain more rhetorical ratcheting up from the US given sensitivity to stock market levels. Yet, looking hard at the epicentre of the trade conflict – the US/China relationship, the bipartisan support in the US for a hard line on China and the difficulty the Chinese authorities will face in making significant concessions, does not suggest any major easing of tensions is likely. Trade conflict may be a slow burner rather than a market destroyer, but it is unlikely to go away and as we have commented through last year, will likely keep coming back to shock markets from time to time. 

Will Europe and China weaken further? Europe’s economic activity levels have fallen back from the previous year, but only to what is widely thought to be trend or underlying growth rates rather than anything worse. In the absence of new shocks, there is no obvious reason to suspect much worse to come this year. Policy normalisation in the form of less stimulus from the European Central Bank is coming, but very slowly. Of course, new shocks in the form of a poorly managed Brexit process, more Italian troubles and a further loss of support of the political centre in the EU are all live risks. How much they will exert pressure on the markets in 2019 is difficult to take a view on. Overall, the balance of risks still tilts to the negative given the range of things that could potentially go wrong. As for China, our view remains that though aggregate growth rates will remain on the soft side, there is enough navigation room using monetary policy to keep growth supported above a notionally minimal level of danger (>5%). While there are undoubted policy conflicts between a notional economic activity target and the wish to reduce the reliance on debt-financed investment spending, we need to remember that the process of restructuring and reform has now been ongoing for a few years with some partial success. The key risk to this view that major downside risk is absent comes from the possibility that trade conflict escalates markedly. Overall, we are working with the view of the Chinese economy looking soggy at a headline level but making some progress at the ground level, i.e. a slow improvement in growth quality. 

Will the US soft land its economy and profits? Will rate worries return? Part of the uncertainty has been about the aftermath of the tax stimulus package in the US which boosted economic growth and bottom lines markedly over the past year. What lies beyond is still a matter of conjecture. A ‘soft landing’ to economic growth rates of perhaps 2% and small but positive growth in corporate profits (consensus is currently seeing mid-single digit growth in US S&P 500 earnings per share in 2019) would be benign and well received, especially given that the market has de-rated to valuation levels which no longer look substantially extended. The complication comes from the fact that the US economic expansion has been running for a very long time, policy interest rates have risen significantly from their lows, and relatively high rates of corporate leverage carry risks if activity slows markedly. Domestic political uncertainty in the US is currently contributing to the bad market mood but this is, with luck, temporary. Our view has been that US late cycle risks are difficult to wish away because they are so dual-sided. If inflation pressures surface, worries over further rises in interest rates could easily return. On the other hand, if the market grows more fearful that the Federal Reserve has already ‘overtightened’, there are obvious difficulties too.  It is this uncertainty that feeds the volatility that we have been seeing and it is hard to see this go away in 2019.   
Will market sentiment stay downbeat? In the way that most problems were ignored earlier, last year saw a dramatic reversal in the market’s interpretation of news-flow. The change in global liquidity conditions from loosening to tightening in 2018 has clearly been the lynchpin of this sea-change in market psychology. Could those animal spirits return again? It may do but it is unlikely to last. Yes a market rebound would not surprise at all at this time – Jerome Powell, Chair of the US Federal Reserve, quite reasonably pointed out last week that the markets have been recently ‘ahead of the data’ in pricing in downside economic risks. If these do not materialise, there is some potential for clawback of lost ground. However, this still looks to be mostly a tactical opportunity and should be used as such. Some rebalancing to risk asset target weights is fair for well-diversified portfolios but for others less well buffered against market pain, it would be an opportunity to divest risk. 
We continue to see recent market behaviour as characteristic of a transition environment that has already moved us well beyond the best times for risk assets. Even if we are not quite ready to run for the hills and take maximum bearish positions now, this year is not offering any obvious route back.

“Content prepared for U.S. subscribers, but available to interested subscribers of other regions.”

The information contained above should be regarded as general information only. That is, your personal objectives, needs or financial situation were not taken into account when preparing this information. Accordingly, you should consider the appropriateness of acting on this information, particularly in the context of your own objectives, financial situation and needs. Nothing in this document should be treated as an authoritative statement of the law on any particular issue or specific case. Use of, or reliance upon any information in this post is at your sole discretion. It should not be construed as legal, tax or investment advice. Please consult with your independent professional for any such advice. The information contained within this blog is given as of the date indicated and does not intend to give information as of any other date. The delivery at any time shall not, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been a change in the information since the date of publication, or any obligation to update or provide amendments after the original publication date. The blog content is intended for professional investors only.

Share:Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to LinkedIn   Print